|
1
|
- Raymond Sauer
- Clemson University
- Mercatus Center
- Capitol Hill Campus
- May 6, 2003
|
|
2
|
- 1965: Lotteries re-appear and now
exist in 3/4 of the states
- 1980s: Casinos expand from NV to
NJ to Midwest Riverboats
- 1990s: Indian Casinos become a
multi-billion dollar sub-industry
|
|
3
|
- Gambling in US has been episodic
- Prior episodes generated significant opposition & subsequent
prohibition
- Well-organized opposition exists in the current wave, as before
- Does gambling sow seeds of its demise?
- Alternative: what does economics
imply?
|
|
4
|
- Political Choices: some goods are
more effectively provided by government
- Political institutions are built
- Demand for goods from competing groups
- Scarcity implies political tradeoffs since all constituents’ demands
can’t be satisfied
- “Goods” can be interpreted to be the absence of costly actions: crime,
drugs, prostitution, casinos
- Why does policy towards gambling change?
- Do the tradeoffs change over time?
|
|
5
|
- The interest groups create the political tradeoff
- Some of the virtuous have long argued against gambling
- “…such is the corruption of mankind, that the mere hope of getting the
riches of another man without doing anything for it, will engage men to
run the hazard of being losers” Judgment of the Ministers (Boston), May
1699
- Curtailment creates pockets of rent for those who can obtain rights to
provide gambling opportunities
|
|
6
|
- “Gambling enjoys a poor reputation, one that is somehow improved when
sponsored by the state…..”
- R. Martin and B. Yandle, 1990
- References to “casting of lots” in the Bible appear more favorable when
priests are in charge
|
|
7
|
- "Casting of lots" in the Bible
- Used to allocate land, jobs, families!!
- 1 Chronicles 25: "Young and
old alike, teacher as well as student, cast lots for their duties"
- Tudor England
- Parliament resisted raising taxes
- Crown adopted lotteries to finance infrastructure
|
|
8
|
- Laissez Faire 1621-1720
- Licensed Public & Private 1720-1833
- Abolition I 1833-1860
- Southern Lotteries 1865-1895
- Abolition II 1895-1965
- Modern Lotteries 1965-????
|
|
9
|
- California Casinos
- Gold Rush (Laissez Faire) 1848-1849
- Licensed Gambling 1849-1855
- Successive Restrictions 1855-1891
- Nevada Casinos
- Legal but secondary to 1909
- Ban Repealed 1931-present
- Horse Racing
- Commercialization Late 19th C
- Abolition 1900-1909
- Pari-mutuel Era 1933-present
|
|
10
|
- Jamestown Settlement (1612-20)
- Colleges:
- Columbia, Dartmouth, Harvard, Princeton
- Public Works & Civil Defense
- Resale of houses, land, slaves
- Thomas Jefferson: “an article
of property, insusceptible of division...is sometimes of so large a
value that no purchaser can be found while the owner owes debts... The
lottery here is a salutary instrument for it”
|
|
11
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
13
|
- Link to jpg file (314kb)
- Local link for presentation
|
|
14
|
- City Lottery Shops circa
1830
- Baltimore 40
- NYC 160
- Philadelphia 200
- Shops offered ‘std’ means of finance
- Example: S&M Allen &
other firms began as lottery shops before moving into banking
|
|
15
|
- States outlawing lotteries
- Constitutional Bans
- LA (1845); IL (1848); IN (1851), KS, MN, OR, & SC (1850)
- Lottery States in 1860:
- DE, MO, KY (court challenges to
ban)
- The Friend, a Quaker publication
& opponent of lotteries, expressed gratitude for a successful
campaign
- Lotteries were common in 1830, gone by 1860?
|
|
16
|
- Lotteries resurfaced in the south during & after the civil war
- KY (1862)
- LA (1864)
- AL, GA (1866)
- MS (1867)
- Abolition II: By mid-1880s all
but Louisiana’s had been repealed; LA Lottery died in 1895
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
- Racing once the province of the gentry
- Planters in VA, KY, SC would challenge each other and gamble among
themselves
- Late 19th C:
Commercialization
- Bookmakers “serve” the public at permanent tracks such Churchill, Pimlico,
Saratoga
- Note: legal lotteries were
increasingly scarce
|
|
19
|
- Opposition grew with business
- 1897-1908: bookmaking banned
- operating racetracks fell from 314 to 25
- Only 3 racing states in 1909
- A long pause….then boom! 10
states legalize pari-mutuel wagering in a single year………1933
- 1933 is the biggest “liberalization” of gambling law in US history
|
|
20
|
- Opponents & proponents are in an ongoing political contest
- Major changes in political tradeoffs occur when significant changes in
gambling legislation occur
- Opponents demand restrictions
- This demand takes gambling out the free market & leads to state
control of varying forms
|
|
21
|
- A latent demand for risk-taking exists, particularly in young men
- Settled societies - not cowboys, sailors, or miners -worry more about
raising children and gambling’s potential adverse effects
- Post gold rush migration quote:
people from the east “brought their laws with them”
- Suppliers offer risk-taking opportunities for financial gain
- Ironically, when gambling is restricted below the free market level
their political activity is increased
|
|
22
|
- Were early colonies hampered in power to tax & spend?
- Did significant improvements in American capital markets take place in
early 19th Century?
- Are states more likely to use alternative revenue sources in a budget
crunch?
- Do higher tax burdens increase the political cost of increasing tax
rates?
|
|
23
|
- Early American Lotteries
- Low Colonial powers of taxation
- High cost of taxing newly developing land
- Insufficient public investment from Crown
- Resort to lottery finance
- Increased governmental powers accompanied licensing & registration,
early 18th C
|
|
24
|
- Abolition I (early 19th C)
- U.S. financial institution were
transformed from an undeveloped state to the most sophisticated in the
world (R. Sylla)
- Southern Lotteries (1865) & Pari-mutuels (1933)
- Abolition II?
- Strengthening of southern states; move to relatively efficient income
taxation in early 20th C
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
- Western States (CA especially) had higher dependence on property tax
revenues
- Prop 13 was the California prop tax revolt
- spread to neighbors, all cutting property taxes
- No Western State had a lottery until 1981
- CA, OR, WA, AZ, CO all Western States passed lottery legislation in the
1980s
|
|
27
|
- The contest over gambling restrictions is perpetual
- Opposition more successful when political costs of restricting gambling
are reduced
- Gambling proponents are more successful when the costs of alternative
funds is higher
|
|
28
|
- This model says it is unlikely -- unless government revenue requirements
are suddenly reduced
- What about Internet Gambling?
- -- Indian Casinos?
- Stay tuned for “Let It Ride”
|